Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has confronted criticism not solely from India, but in addition again dwelling after acknowledging that he had solely intelligence info and no concrete proof on his allegation that Indian brokers have been behind the homicide of Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar. Canadian journalist Daniel Bordman referred to as it a “big victory” for the Indian narrative, whereas one other political commentator mentioned Trudeau’s deposition was an “absolute catastrophe.”
“It is a fairly massive victory for the Indian narrative proper now… From the Canadian perspective, we had made a variety of effort. We had reached the purpose the place we had expelled a diplomat… Now we have appointed the Indian Excessive Fee “We began this publicly,” Bordman, who has been criticizing Trudeau for. upping the ante towards India on the Khalistan situation, he instructed ANI.
The Canadian journalist additionally famous that the diplomatic dispute between India and Canada centered on whether or not Nijjar was a Khalistani terrorist or a group activist. “That basic disagreement has not moved,” he mentioned.
“On the technical geopolitical aspect, India wins right here since you by no means mentioned you had proof,” Bordman mentioned.
Hardeep Nijjar was shot and killed in Surrey, British Columbia, in June of final 12 months. Weeks later, Trudeau claimed that Indian brokers have been allegedly concerned within the assassination of the Khalistani terrorist.
The final confrontation between Delhi and Ottawa occurred after the The Canadian authorities mentioned Indian diplomatstogether with the Excessive Commissioner, have been “individuals of curiosity” within the homicide investigation. This was adopted by an expulsion of six diplomats.
Testifying at Canada’s international interference inquiry on Wednesday, Trudeau admitted that his authorities solely had “intelligence” and never “probative proof” of hyperlinks between Indian authorities officers and Nijjar’s homicide. The admission gave India extra ammunition to assault Trudeau for pandering to the Khalistani vote financial institution to safe its political future.
Kirk Lubimov, a political commentator and businessman, referred to as Trudeau’s testimony “lies” and an “absolute catastrophe.” “Did Justin Trudeau simply say there is not any proof relating to the India brouhaha?… This isn’t good,” he mentioned.
“I did not suppose it might get any worse this week for Canada, however it did, and it is solely Wednesday,” Lubimov tweeted.
One other Canadian journalist, Sameer Kaushal, commented: “What did Prime Minister Justin Trudeau simply say? There isn’t a exhausting proof.”
Trudeau’s assertion was music to India’s ears, with the international ministry saying it “confirms” New Delhi’s constant place that Ottawa “didn’t current proof” in help of the intense allegations.