Bangladesh’s Lawyer Common has referred to as for main revisions to the Structure, suggesting the elimination of the phrase “secular” since 90% of the nation’s inhabitants was Muslim. Lawyer Common Md. Asaduzzaman offered his arguments throughout a courtroom listening to on the legality of the fifteenth Modification earlier than Justices Farah Mahbub and Debashish Roy Chowdhury.
“Earlier, there was fixed belief and religion in Allah. I need it because it was earlier than. Article 2A says that the State will guarantee equal rights and equality within the observe of all religions. Article 9 talks about ‘Bengali nationalism ‘. ‘It is contradictory,’ he mentioned.
The Lawyer Common argued that constitutional amendments ought to replicate democracy and keep away from selling authoritarianism.
It additionally objected to Articles 7A and 7B, which prohibit any modification or change that would “subvert democracy”, claiming that they undermine democracy by proscribing reforms and consolidating political energy.
“It’s accomplished to lengthen the dictatorship with ulterior motives. It’s the antithesis of the rule of regulation,” Asaduzzaman mentioned.
Asaduzzaman additionally condemned the elimination of the caretaker authorities system, beforehand used to supervise elections. In keeping with him, the elimination of the interim system has restricted the basic rights of Bangladeshi residents, eroded public belief and weakened the nation’s democratic basis.
Calling for the cancellation of the fifteenth modification, Asaduzzaman argued that it alters the legacy of Bangladesh’s independence and contradicts the “spirit of the Liberation Warfare” in addition to the democratic uprisings of the Nineteen Nineties.
He added that most of the amendments, together with labeling Sheikh Mujibur Rahman as “Father of the Nation”, divide the nation and limit freedom of expression. “Honoring Sheikh Mujib’s contributions is important,” he mentioned, “however implementing them by regulation creates division.”
Asaduzzaman referred to as for constitutional reforms to align with the values ​​of democracy, the Liberation Warfare and nationwide unity, and urged the courtroom to think about the unconstitutionality of the fifteenth Modification.
